Canterbury Tales :: essays research papers

Canterbury TalesCharacter AnalysisChaucers greatest work came after everything else. Canterbury tales was the last of his literary works. It followed such stories as Troilus and Creseyde. It is considered as oneness of the greatest works of literature during the English Middle Age. The juiceless thing is that it wasnt even finished the way Chaucer had intended it to. He had planned to have over a hundred tales, four for each pilgrim. He ended up with twenty-four, less than one for each pilgrim. atomic number 53 wonders if he had finished how much better would it have been. The story is a unique one, especially during the time in which it was written. Rather than a tralatitious author story format, Chaucer rehearses a distinct method to spin a number of different types of stories. By telling different stories through different pilgrims Chaucer uses their attitudes and characteristics so that he may tell tales of many a(prenominal) different varieties and styles. This shows the many different creative sides and motives of the great author. He was not the first to use such a method, but he may be one of the most famous, earliest of its users. Among the number of characters and different storytellers you come across a character by the name of Robin. His standing among the company was the moth miller, so that was what he would be more commonly known. Immediately following the Knight the miller had a pretty tough act to follow. The Knight was obviously of steep standing, and would previously tell a noble tale with a moral flavor to it. It would leave the crowd in state of appreciation for individual of his stature. When his tale was through with(p) the people knew why it was that he was Knight. Although, when the Miller was done the people did also realize why he was the Miller. When the Knights tale had finished the Miller decided it was his turn for the spotlight. Chaucer makes it quite unproblematic to understand the contrast in the characters. Espe cially making the claims one refine after the other. The comparison is easily made. The drunken boisterous Miller pipes up claiming to have a tale that would contend with the Knights for macrocosm noble and attractive. Sensing the drunkenness, the host speaks up telling the Miller to dispense with his tale for another time knowing of what was to come. The loud and cocky Miller overpowers him.